Topic 5.8 · teacher page

Running the trapezoidal rule

Five readings, four strips, and how to make the direction of the error something they can state without calculating.

The one thing to do with the animation

Ask whether the estimate is too big or too small before pressing anything. Most classes think it is a coin toss, or that the errors cancel. Then run the strips on y = x² and point at the slivers of red sticking out above the curve, every single one on the same side.

Then switch to 8x − x². The slivers are now gaps underneath. Within a minute the class can predict the direction of the error from the shape alone, which is exactly what the question asks for.

The numbers

y = x² on [0, 4]Heights 0, 1, 4, 9, 16. Four strips give 22; the true area is 64⁄3 ≈ 21.33, so it is too big. Eight strips give 21.5, halving the error.
y = 8x − x² on [0, 4]Heights 0, 7, 12, 15, 16. Four strips give 42; the true area is 128⁄3 ≈ 42.67, so it is too small.
The lakeh = 10, widths 0, 14, 22, 18, 0. Middles sum to 54, doubled to 108, times 5 gives 540 m².
1. Four-strip estimate22.
2. Curve bending downB, too small, chords below the curve.
3. Lake area540 m².

Where the marks go

1 markThe correct h. With five readings there are four strips. This single misreading accounts for more lost marks here than everything else combined.

1 markThe bracket: ends once, middles twice, written out in full.

1 markThe arithmetic and the units.

1 markStating the direction of the error with a reason about the shape. "It is only an estimate" earns nothing.

What each wrong answer tells you

They writeWhat it means
17.6 (Q1)Five strips. They counted readings instead of gaps, so h became 0.8. The error to watch for.
30 (Q1)Doubled the end values too. They have the shape of the formula but not its asymmetry.
44 (Q1)Forgot to multiply by h over 2. Usually a dropped step rather than a misunderstanding.
21.33 (Q1)Integrated instead. Right mathematics, wrong question, and it shows they can do 5.5.
"Errors cancel" (Q2)The intuition the animation is built to kill. Send them back to look at which side every sliver is on.
1080 (Q3)Used h rather than h over 2. The commonest slip once the formula is remembered at all.

Other things they will say

"Why not just integrate?" Because there is often no function. The lake has measurements and nothing else, and that is the case the rule exists for. It is worth saying before the function example, not after.

"Does it ever become exact?" Only if the curve is a straight line. More strips always help, and the page shows 4 to 8 halving the error, but a chord is never a curve.

"Can the widths be unequal?" Not for this rule as it is set here; equal intervals are part of it. If data arrives unevenly spaced, that is beyond what is being asked.

A possible order

 What is happening
1Show a shape with no equation, like a lake or a field. How would you find its area? Let them propose strips themselves.
2The animation. Predict the direction of the error, then watch it, then switch curves.
3The formula, with ends and middles colour coded on the board. The h question, slowly.
4The function example, then the lake. Insist the bracket is written out.
5Questions 1 to 3. Question 2 is the one worth taking to the whole class.
6Link back to 5.5: when you have a function, integrate; when you have a table, use strips.

Two things not to say

Do not say "n strips" while pointing at a list of n readings. Count the gaps out loud with them the first time. The whole error lives in that sentence.

Do not describe the estimate as "close enough" without the direction. Knowing it is an overestimate is more useful than knowing it is close, and it is the part that is actually assessed.

Questions to set

Three tiers, ramping the way practice should: the method on its own, then the method inside something real, then a challenge. Set the tier the class in front of you needs rather than one undifferentiated sheet. Answers are given so these can go straight onto a board.

1Fluency

The method on its own, with friendly numbers. Set these first and move on quickly once they are secure.

  1. Apply the ruleEstimate the integral of x² from 0 to 2 with 4 strips.
    2.75
  2. CompareThe exact value is 8/3 = 2.667. State the error.
    0.083 too big.

2In context

The same skill inside a real situation, where the first job is working out what is being asked.

  1. Halve the widthEstimate the same integral with 8 strips and state the new error.
    2.6875, so an error of 0.0208.
  2. Explain the directionWhy is the estimate too big for this curve?
    y = x² is concave up, so every chord lies above the curve and each trapezium includes a sliver that is not under the graph.

3Challenge

Reasoning, working backwards, or spotting an error. These are where the top grades are decided.

  1. Quantify the improvementThe errors were 0.0833 and 0.0208. State the ratio and what it says about the rule.
    Exactly 4. Halving the strip width quarters the error, so the rule is second order in h. Doubling the work buys four times the accuracy.
  2. Predict the other directionFor a curve that is concave down, state whether the trapezoidal rule over or underestimates, and why.
    It underestimates. The chords lie below the curve, so each trapezium misses a sliver that is under the graph. The concavity, not the function, decides the direction.

Practicalities

The Add strips button steps from 1 to 12 rather than sliding, so each new strip is visible as a separate event. No external library, nothing stored, nothing sent.